I think there's some parallel to how we use information on the web today. Retweeting, "liking", "pinning" or re-blogging about an idea do not necessarily indicate an understanding of an idea.
For example: I just posted a list of seven ways to promote student engagement in our classrooms. I discovered the list on a blog entry on Edutopia.com. Edutopia sourced the list from a blog entry by Stacy Hurst on ReadingHorizons.com. Stacy Hurst references four texts in her blog.
What I find interesting, is that each of the repostings deleted information. The original article explains the importance of student engagement and provides ideas on tracking it in the classroom. Edutopia omitted that aspect of the original post and highlighted the inclusion of an infographic listing of the tips. My reposting further edited the information down to just the list of tips -- assuming that the value of these ideas was self-evident. I omitted the infographic that Edutopia highlighted (I think it's an example of an infographic that doesn't add value -- I don't learn or understand the content any better by viewing it in graphical form as opposed to the original list). A reader's understanding of the list of tips could vary considerably depending on where he/she encountered them, and the reader's interest in pursuing the ideas to their source.
No comments:
Post a Comment